December 01
Dolores Utrilla
23rd October 2020
Covid-19 External Relations & Trade Institutional law Internal Market

European Ombudsman: no maladministration in the Commission refusing to suspend or extend deadlines in an anti-dumping investigation in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

The European Ombudsman has issued a decision in case 924/2020/TE, concluding that no maladministration existed in the Commission’s refusal to put on hold an anti-dumping investigation (into imports of Chinese aluminium products) due to the COVID-19 pandemic or, in the alternative, to give an Italian importer more time to respond to information requests sent to it by the Commission.

Under the Basic anti-dumping Regulation 2016/1036 the Commission does not have the power to put investigations on hold. However, given the exceptional circumstances, on 16 March 2020 the Commission published a ‘Notice on the consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak on anti-dumping investigations’. The COVID-19 Notice allows the Commission to extend the deadlines for responding to questionnaires and other requests for information, provided such extensions do not risk the timely conclusion of anti-dumping investigations.

The Commission found no maladministration in how the Commission dealt with the applicant’s claim because he was granted an extension under the COVID-19 notice, and a  further extension of deadlines may have undermined the Commission’s ability to meet its obligations to complete the anti-dumping investigation within the legal deadlines that are binding on it. 

The Ombudsman’s decision closing the case is available here.


Your privacy is important for us

We use cookies to improve the user experience. Please review privacy preferences.

Accept all Settings

Check our privacy policy and cookies policy.