January 23
download app
download appDOWNLOAD OUR APP
download google-play
download app-store
Dolores Utrilla
Dolores Utrilla
20th September 2021
Human Rights Internal Market Justice & Litigation

Op-Ed: “On procedural pluralism, effective remedies and dogs that do not bark (yet): The opinion of Advocate General Hogan in Randstad” by Giulia Gentile

On 9 September 2021, Advocate General (AG) Hogan delivered his Opinion in Randstad Italia (C-497/20). The issues raised by this preliminary ruling case are, on the surface, uncomplicated. The referring court asked, first, whether national rules can be interpreted in a way that limits the duty for courts against whose decision there is no remedy to submit a preliminary ruling request; second, whether national procedures can be interpreted in a way that precludes an appeal in cassation to challenge decisions of national courts which misapply EU law; and, finally, the referring court requested clarifications on the scope of judicial review in the context of public procurement procedures. There is extensive case law on all of these questions


Your privacy is important for us

We use cookies to improve the user experience. Please review privacy preferences.

Accept all Settings

Check our privacy policy and cookies policy.