Friday, May 17 2024
download app
download appDOWNLOAD OUR APP
download google-play
download app-store
Sara Iglesias
Sara Iglesias
share
31st March 2022
Human Rights Justice & Litigation

Op-Ed: “Saying Less is Sometimes More (even in Rule-of-Law Cases): Grzęda v Poland” by David Kosar and Mathieu Leloup

On 15 March the European Court of Human Rights issued its first Grand Chamber judgment on the rule of law crisis in Poland. In Grzęda, the Court had to rule whether the premature termination of the judicial members of the National Council of the Judiciary (NCJ), as a part of the wide-scale judicial reforms, complied with the Convention. More specifically, the question was whether Article 6(1) ECHR is applicable under its civil head to a dispute arising out of the premature termination of a judge’s term of office as a judicial member of the NCJ, while he still remains a serving judge (§ 265). The Grand Chamber concluded, by sixteen votes to one, that the civil limb of Article 6(1) ECHR applies to the present dispute and that there was a v

×

Your privacy is important for us

We use cookies to improve the user experience. Please review privacy preferences.

Accept all Settings

Check our privacy policy and cookies policy.

Cookies