Op-Ed: “Why Bother with Legal Reasoning? The Legality of Export Restrictions in Commission v. Hungary (C-499/23)”
Vincent Delhomme
My colleague Martijn van den Brink will hopefully forgive me for borrowing the title of his own blogpost, ‘Why bother with legal reasoning’, written in relation to Commission v. Malta (C-181/23). The judgment in Commission v. Hungary (C-499/23) concerns a different subject matter and arguably has more limited implications, but it reveals similar tendencies in the Court’s willingness to dispense with rigorous legal reasoning, even in cases that, unlike Commission v Malta, present no difficulty and result in a hardly contestable outcome. The present judgement is also interesting on substance because it involves a type of measure seldom adopted by Member States, export restrictions – these had briefly been revived in the context of the COV
